Vintage & antique measuring scales, 6 inch metal rules, old tool advertising rulers Collection of seven 6' metal rules with some nice old advertising from hardware sellers. These are all in good clean condition overa. The Poker Chips Scale (A – 8)involves the use of 4 red poker chips; with these chips, the child is asked to to pick the number of poker chips that best indicate the intensity of pain (4 chips indicate the most intense pain). Rating Scales Applicable to Infants and Preverbal Children. The Pieces of Hurt Tool has been used to assess pain in children ranging from 3 to 18 years of age (Stinson et al., 2006) in a variety of pediatric clinical environments including pediatric postoperative, postprocedural, hematology/oncology clinics and intensive care units (Stinson et al., 2006).
- Poker Chip Tool Pain Scale Age List
- Poker Chip Tool Pain Scale Age Range
- Stewart B, Lancaster G, Lawson J, Williams K, Daly J. Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(7):625-630.
- Dehghani H, Tavangar H, Ghandehari A. Validity and reliability of behavioral pain scale in patients with low level of consciousness due to head trauma hospitalized in intensive care unit. Arch Trauma Res. 2014;3(1):e18608.
- Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(5):309-318.
- Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129-138.
- Feldt KS. The checklist of nonverbal pain indicators (CNPI). Pain Manag Nurs. 2000;1(1):13-21.
- Busner J, Targum S. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007;4(7):28-37.
- Boitor M, Fiola JL, Gelinas C. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool and vital signs in relation to the sensory and affective components of pain during mediastinal tube removal in postoperative cardiac surgery intensive care unit adults. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Mar 30 [Epub ahead of print].
- Gelinas C, Harel F, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Johnston CC. Sensitivity and specificity of the critical-care pain observation tool for the detection of pain in intubated adults after cardiac surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37(1):58-67.
- Andersen T, Christensen FB, Bunger C. Evaluation of a Dallas Pain Questionnaire classification in relation to outcome in lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(11):1671-1685.
- Doctor JN, Slater MA, Atkinson JH. The Descriptor Differential Scale of Pain Intensity: an evaluation of item and scale properties. Pain. 1995;61(2):251-260.
- Gracely R, Kwilosz D. The Descriptor Differential Scale: applying psychophysical principles to clinical pain assessment. Pain. 1988;35(3):279-288.
- Watanabe SM, Nekolaichuk CL, Beaumont C. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: development and refinement. Psychooncology. 2012;21(9):977-985.
- Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, et al. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):50-54.
- Douglas ME, Randleman ML, DeLane AM, Palmer GA. Determining pain scale preference in a veteran population experiencing chronic pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15(3):625-631.
- Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire. In: Melzack R, ed. Pain Measurement and Assessment. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1983:41-47.
- Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, Darden BV 2nd. Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine. 1999;24(13):1290-1294.
- Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115-3124.
- Hearn J, Higginson I. Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Qual Health Care. 1999;8(4):219-227.
- Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale. Pain. 1975;1(4):379-384.
This tool was originally created with children for children to help them communicate about their pain.
Now the scale is used around the world with people ages 3 and older, facilitating communication
and improving assessment so pain management can be addressed.
If you would like access to the Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale, please click
Access the FACES Scale and choose a category that best describes your needs.
- The FACES Scale is widely used with people ages three and older, not limited to children.
- This self-assessment tool must be understood by the patient, so they are able to choose the face that best illustrates the physical pain they are experiencing.
- It is not a tool to be used by a third person, parents, healthcare professionals, or caregivers, to assess the patient’s pain. There are other tools for those purposes.
Stay On: Build Resilience and Thrive While Facing Cancer - Available Now!
Receiving a new cancer diagnosis is often overwhelming for patients and the people who love them.
Sometimes it feels like the world has turned upside down.
Suddenly and unexpectedly, you’re required to make crucial decisions regarding a medical team and treatment plan.
But, you’re not alone. I’ve been in your shoes, and I’ll share with you what I’ve learned.
I know you have answers to your questions within you, and through this book, I’ll help you find them.
We are excited to present our pain care podcast, FACES of Pain Care, where Connie Baker highlights and interviews people and programs creating a real difference in pain care and atraumatic care. In case that term is not familiar to you, atraumatic care minimizes or eliminates physical and psychological distress for patients and families.
Visit our FACES OF Pain Care page to find out more information and subscribe to our podcast
You may even want torecommend a topic or person for future podcasts.
FACES of Pain Care – Episode 13 – Palliative Care with Dr. Frank D. Ferris
After listening to this podcast, you will leave feeling energized by the prospect of palliative care and the benefits a comprehensive team approach brings to patients, families, communities, and healthcare organizations. Everybody wins. Dr. Frank D. Ferris is the executive director of the Palliative Medicine, Research, and Education for Ohio Health. He is a global expert in palliative…
FACES of Pain Care
FACES of Pain Care – Episode 12 – Coping Strategies when Disaster Strikes with Dr. Laurie Nadel
Our guest discusses coping strategies to bring hope, healing, and strength even in disaster. Dr. Laurie Nadel is a specialist in acute stress, trauma, and anxiety issues and author of The Five Gifts: Discovering Hope, Healing, and Strength When Disaster Strikes. Her first career, as a journalist, led her to spend twenty years writing and producing hard news, meaning…
FACES of Pain Care
FACES of Pain Care – Episode 11 – Frequency Specific Microcurrent with Dr. Carolyn McMakin
Learn more about Frequency Specific Microcurrent (FSM) from the developer, Dr. Carolyn McMakin. FSM is an exciting new way of treating nerve, muscle pain, and many other conditions using specific frequencies and micro amperage current. Dr. Carolyn McMakin developed Frequency Specific Microcurrent (FSM) in 1996 and began teaching it in 1997. She has a part-time…
FACES of Pain Care